This guide is pending expert review.
Elder Fraud Statistics: What FBI IC3 and FTC Numbers Really Show
Not yet expert-reviewed · Last updated October 30, 2026
Elder Fraud Statistics: Reading the FBI and FTC Numbers Without Panic
Key takeaways
- FBI IC3 (2025): People age 60+ filed 201,266 complaints with $7.748 billion in reported losses—37% more complaints and 59% more losses than 2024. Average loss among those who reported a dollar figure in the elder highlights: about $38,500. 12,444 complainants lost more than $100,000.[1]
- Highest IC3 loss types for 60+: Investment (
$3.52 billion), tech/customer support ($1.04 billion), romance/confidence ($584 million), business email compromise ($568 million), government impersonation (~$413 million).[1] - FTC Consumer Sentinel (2025): Among fraud reports that included age, about 469,597 came from people 60+; about 123,000 of those showed a money loss; reported losses totaled over $3 billion (up from about $2.4 billion in 2024). Median loss for 60+ held near $900; for 80+ the median was $2,000.[2]
- IC3 and FTC are different databases. Do not add the dollar totals together.[1][2]
- Both agencies stress massive underreporting. FTC estimates the true 2025 cost to older adults between $13.3 billion and $119.5 billion under different assumptions—wide on purpose.[2]
- For how scams work and what to do, see elder fraud and the grandparent scam. This page focuses on reading the data.
Two official pictures (do not mix them)
| Dataset | Who collects it | 2025 older-adult snapshot (opened sources) | Best use |
|---|---|---|---|
| FBI IC3 | Internet Crime Complaint Center | 60+: 201,266 complaints; $7.748B losses[1] | Cyber-enabled / internet crime patterns; crime-type loss ranking |
| FTC Sentinel | FTC + partner agencies | 60+ fraud reports with age: ~469,597; loss reports ~123,000; >$3B reported losses[2] | Broader consumer fraud + identity theft context; medians by age |
Sentinel excludes IC3 data from most of its older-adult tables because age ranges are collected differently.[2] Treat each number as “what people reported to that system,” not a complete national census.
IC3 2025: complaints vs losses
| Metric (complainants 60+) | 2025 | Change vs 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| Complaints | 201,266 | +37%[1] |
| Reported losses | $7.748 billion | +59%[1] |
| Average loss (elder highlights) | ~$38,500 | —[1] |
| Complainants with loss > $100K | 12,444 | —[1] |
How to read “average loss”: It is pulled up by huge investment and crypto cases. It is not what a “typical” household lost. FTC’s median (~$900 for 60+) is closer to a middle experience among people who reported a loss to Sentinel—and still is not “what everyone loses.”[1][2]
Top IC3 crime types by loss (60+, 2025)
| Crime type | Reported losses (60+) |
|---|---|
| Investment | $3,519,296,354 |
| Tech / customer support | $1,040,730,043 |
| Confidence / romance | $584,032,745 |
| Business email compromise | $568,048,472 |
| Government impersonation | $413,206,251 |
| Personal data breach | $324,470,413 |
| Lottery / sweepstakes / inheritance | $136,328,519 |
From IC3 2025 Annual Report elder section.[1]
Top IC3 crime types by complaint count (60+, 2025)
Volume and dollars diverge: phishing/spoofing led counts (48,064) but ranked far lower by loss (~$77 million). Tech/customer support (21,333) and investment (16,926) sat near the top of both lists in different ways.[1]
Descriptors IC3 flags for 60+
| Descriptor | Complaints (60+) | Related reported losses (60+) |
|---|---|---|
| Cryptocurrency | 42,271 | $4,347,081,557 |
| AI-related | 3,143 | $352,496,231 |
Descriptors can overlap crime types; they are tags, not a separate exclusive bucket.[1]
IC3’s elder brochure summarizes the same year in round numbers: over 201,000 victims 60+, more than $7.7 billion lost, average loss over $38,000, more than 12,000 people over $100,000.[3] Prefer the annual report’s precise $7.748B / 37% / 59% split when you cite percentages.[1]
FTC Sentinel 2025: medians and underreporting
Key findings from the FTC’s Protecting Older Consumers report (Sentinel calendar year 2025):[2]
- Aggregate reported fraud losses by adults 60+ rose about fivefold from 2020 (
$600 million) to 2025 ($3 billion), driven largely by very large individual losses. - Older adults report higher median losses than younger adults when money is lost; ages 80+ median $2,000.
- Older adults are less likely than younger adults to report that money was lost on a given fraud report, and more likely to file no-loss reports.
- Relative to younger adults, older adults more often report losses on tech support, prize/sweepstakes/lottery, romance, government impersonation, and friend/family impersonation.
- By aggregate dollars, top types for older adults: investment, government impersonation, business impersonation. Investment losses jumped 42% in 2025; many victims describe fake crypto platforms reached via social media.
- Social media produced the highest aggregate losses and loss-report counts for older adults; phone contact still had a much higher median ($3,000 vs $599 for social media in the report’s comparison).[2]
- Payment methods with the highest aggregate losses: bank transfers / payments, then cryptocurrency; credit cards were the most frequently reported method.[2]
FTC estimate of true 2025 cost to older adults: $13.3B–$119.5B, depending on underreporting assumptions—the wide band is itself the message.[2]
What the numbers mean for families (original teaching aid)
Use this data checklist when you talk with parents or adult children:
- Big totals ≠ everyone is about to lose thousands. Most people are not IC3 complainants. Focus on high-loss scam types: investment/crypto, tech support, romance, government/bank impersonation.[1][2]
- Ask about contact channel. Social media and phone both matter; phone often means higher median loss.[2]
- Never judge reporting rates. Shame and confusion suppress reports; official totals are floors, not ceilings.[1][2]
- Practice before a crisis. Run the Is this a scam? checklist. Paste suspicious texts into
. 5. Know the first-hour path. How to report a scam — ReportFraud.ftc.gov and ic3.gov. 6. Tactics and AI voice clones: Elder fraud and the grandparent scam. 7. Deeper practice when ready:
FAQ
Why don’t IC3 and FTC totals match?
Different systems, different reporting paths, and Sentinel generally excludes IC3 rows from its older-adult fraud tables.[2]
Is elder fraud “only” internet crime?
IC3 focuses on internet-enabled complaints. FTC Sentinel also covers many phone, mail, and in-person consumer fraud reports that people choose to file.[1][2]
Should I buy identity-theft monitoring because of these stats?
Stats alone do not choose a product. See identity theft protection for seniors and free steps at IdentityTheft.gov.
Where do I report?
ic3.gov (FBI IC3) and ReportFraud.ftc.gov (FTC). Older adults can also use the National Elder Fraud Hotline (833) FRAUD-11 / (833) 372-8311 listed in IC3 elder materials.[3]
Sources
- Federal Bureau of Investigation, Internet Crime Complaint Center. 2025 Internet Crime Report (Elder Fraud section: complaints filed by individuals 60+). https://www.ic3.gov/AnnualReport/Reports/2025_IC3Report.pdf. Accessed October 30, 2026. (Full PDF downloaded and text extracted.)
- Federal Trade Commission. Protecting Older Consumers 2025–2026: A Report of the Federal Trade Commission (Consumer Sentinel section). https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/2026-older-adults-report-10192026.pdf (also mirrored at search.ftc.gov path used for download). Accessed October 30, 2026. (Full PDF opened.)
- Federal Bureau of Investigation / IC3. Elder Fraud tri-fold brochure (“Report It!”). https://www.ic3.gov/Outreach/Brochures/elder_fraud_tri-fold.pdf. Accessed October 30, 2026. (Full PDF opened.)
- Federal Trade Commission. ReportFraud.ftc.gov. https://reportfraud.ftc.gov/. Accessed October 30, 2026.
Disclaimer
This article is for general education only and is not medical, legal, or financial advice. Crime statistics are incomplete and change yearly. Talk to a licensed attorney or law enforcement about your situation if you were targeted. In an emergency, call 911.
Attribution
Portions of this page are adapted from "HowToLiveBetter" (高性价比人生指南) by eternity4719, https://github.com/eternity4719/HowToLiveBetter, licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Changes: topic and evidence approach adapted from Chapter 08; rewritten for U.S. elder-fraud statistics (not a direct translation). China-specific anti-fraud content was not used. Re-sourced to FBI/IC3 and FTC.
Last updated